An Independent Journal for Members of the American Federation of Musicians



The following off-topic post has no redeeming union-related value.

It's hopeless...

On National Public Radio's 'All Things Considered' yesterday, NPR airhead Michele Norris was speaking with an Illinois employer sympathetic to the demonstrators at the immigration reform rallies. The employer had been talking about the extent of business support for the demonstrators' goals.

The annoyingly breathy, and oh-so-sincere, Norris said:

When we looked at the pictures of demonstrators marching through the streets of so many cities, what you didn't see are the business owners that hire many of those people.

I guess what I'm asking is, even though the businesses weren't there...

 

As Humpty Dumpty might say to Alice, if you can SEE that the businesses weren't there, you've better eyes than most.

Later in the show, the PRINCIPAL of a Montessori school in Chicago showed off her command of the language:

Each child has an individual educational plan, and this is what you see when you walk in: you see children working individually or in groups of one or two...

 

The editor notes that he himself often works in groups of one.

Wednesday, May 3, 2006

 

Discovered on the Internets (revised)

English-as-a-fourth-language department

He had served as Music Director of the Abilene Philharmonic Orchestra for a decade (1993 - 2003) and Green Bay Symphony Orchestra (1995 - 2000) concurrently. During his tenure he successfully accomplished community orchestras to true professional regional orchestras.

(This item also appears in our Can-You-Say-'Cleaning House'? department's files and is originally from a Major Ivy League University website biography of a certain conductor currently making his way around the regional and sub-regional orchestra circuit.)

Friday, April 21, 2006

Revised, on account of nothing in particular, Sunday, April 23, 2006
(original available to internet spies and compulsive regular readers on request)

 

April 20 Temporary Message/query...removed.

We received the information we needed.

Thank you.

The UnionMuse Orchestra Management Revolving Doorkeeper

Sunday, April 23, 2006

 

Updated (edited for clarity)

(Temporary entry, just until the staff returns)


Spring Forward. Fall Down.

 

UnionMuse dedicates this little nothing to those wretched employers who insist on scheduling concerts on the day of the annual spring time change.

 

Yes, it has taken a long time to get new material up. The staff has been on leave for the last month, in anticipation of an early changing of the clock. The tech staff will be off the rest of the week as well (they get unlimited mental hygiene days under their new contract), so we're creating this piece with crayolas and butcher paper. We hope you can read it.

This damned clock change throws all of us off every year. It's "later" by the clock - but strangely it feels even later than that - not earlier.* We stumble around for an entire week (unlike the fall time change, when we only stumble around for a couple of days) -- misplacing our keys, bumping into walls, feeling more stupid than usual.

Look here. Humans made some kind of deal with Time a long time ago. It was probably a bad idea, but there it is. Time is a weird enough concept without mucking with it twice a year.

If an hour is that big a deal, can't we just say, "OK, gang, beginning next Monday, come to work an hour earlier"?** Absolutely NO confusion as to what time it is, right? Not even for a minute. None of this where-am-I-what-time-is-it crapola.

And just because we're unamused by the whole concept, it's Daylight SAVING Time, not Daylight SAVINGS (or SAVING'S) Time, OK?

The preceding message had absolutely nothing to do with the usual UnionMuse agenda, if any.

Returning you now to our irregularly unscheduled postings...

 

* ** [edited: The original version at * read 'it's "later" by the clock - but strangely it feels earlier' and the original version at ** said "come to work an hour later"]

[editor's note 2: The quality of this post is a perfect illustration of the perils of time change.]

[editor's note 3: It is possible that the corrections make as little sense as the originals. Go away and come back tomorrow. We'll have a bit of nice scotch it you get here early enough. (or is it late enough?)]

 

Monday, April 3, 2006

 

We are sorry to announce that the
UnionMuse Post-Valentine Day Weenie Roast and Hunter Safety Seminar has been postponed indefinitely on account of seasonal affective disorder and home wiring projects.

 

In its place, we will, at our earliest availability, return with a few comments on the official Glorious History of the AFM...not to mention returning with an ACTUAL history (and well written at that), though incidental, though not glorious, of said union, via a history of its most major metropolitan local. Or else we will return with our long delayed Myths Concerning the MP[T]F series.

One or the other. Or both. Or neither.

Thursday, February 23, 2006

 

 

Lee redesigns the AFM's Great Seal

In a stunning display of imagination, graphics ability and executive hubris, AFM President Tom Lee has redesigned the AFM's most recognizable symbol.

Immediately after the announcement, protests from hundreds of members began to flood the switchboard at 1501 Broadway. However, the International Executive Board is expected to rubber stamp give its approval to the new design at its next regular meeting even though none of the executive officers queried approves of the change. "Since Tom has already ordered stationery and new lapel pins, we feel it would be fiscally irresponsible to reverse direction now," said one board member who spoke under condition of anonymity.

The new design is reproduced below.

January 26, 2006


 

 

A safety lamp at the end of the tunnel?

Pittsburgh, Tuesday, January 24, 2006

Special to UnionMuse

The Pittsburgh Ballet Theatre management today announced that it has been working with other area employers to place out of work PBT musicians in temporary jobs until the company gets back on its feet.

Owing to Pittsburgh's proximity to West Virginia, several coal mine operators in that state have expressed an interest in hiring a number of the players.

The union representing miners has also offered its assistance.

At a joint press conference with PBT and representatives of the mining companies, the United Mine Workers of America announced that it would waive initiation fees and a month's dues for any PBT musician who is so hired.

Both the Union and the employers emphasized that despite recent news concerning a few unfortunate incidents in West Virginia mines, the musicians actually would be working in better conditions and with better safety equipment than they typically have available in the orchestra pit.

The pay and benefits would be significantly higher as well, according to the union.

The United Mine Workers' representative also assured the musicians that, as miners, they never would be expected to donate even one hour of work. He insisted that "no miners ever have, and no employer would dare ask them to."

 

 
January 24, 2006

 

January 21, 2006

What, and leave show business?

(Orchestras in the news)

The following lines concerning the Pittsburgh Ballet Theatre Orchestra appeared on January 19 in a Pittsburgh Tribune-Review piece by Mark Kanny [full article]. The article originally was titled, "Kick me," but just before press time, the head was changed to "PBT to reinstate live music."


The Feb. 9 gala opening night of "Coppelia" will be the only performance with an orchestra this season.

...

Incoming executive director Harris Ferris said the orchestra will be used for "at least two of five productions" during the 2006-07 season. The PBT's schedule for next season will be released in February, said artistic director Terrance Orr.

...

The musicians are donating their services for rehearsal and the Feb. 9 performance and will stop picketing at performances.


Donating their services?

Let's see...

Locked out of the first two productions of the season including the long Nutcracker run. Live music for TWO (out of five?) productions next year? ONE performance in one production (of three remaining) this year? NO PAY for that one performance or its rehearsal(s)?

Yeah, sure; we'd like to be professional musicians, too. Where do we sign up?

Do we have to quit our day job?

 

revised for clarity & relevance

 


January 20, 2006

This is not the new UnionMuse computer:

But we did get one.

As soon as we deal with a semi-minor (never mind — we wrote that last night; it's gotten out of hand) plumbing issue, we'll be back with a few little nothings (and/or long promised links to our earlier little nothings, so there's something to read while we dig through the old hard drive to find our notes).


 

Tap, tap, tap...

(Is this thing on?)

January 16, 2006


 

December 31, 2005

Yes, we are here. Still having computer "issues," though.

Juggling paper notes and documents copied from the ailing machine, we hope to use the borrowed machine to get a few new words up. A new computer probably will have to be obtained to continue with this and other projects in any meaningful way.

We will do our best. Thanks to all for your interest.

Happy New Year to everyone.

--The Editor and Staff


 

December 9, 2005

The faithful, though cranky, UnionMuse computer has checked out. We are doing our best to find a replacement.

We have hacked into the site using an older, crankier, machine and hope we are successful in editing the "home" page and getting this message of distress and regret on line.

We will be back as soon as we can replace the computer. First (or second or third) up will be the further adventures of Local 4 - as usual featuring the hijinks of its smiling president, You Know Who.

Revised 8:55 PM: Wayward apostrophe banished.


Returning you now to our irregularly scheduled woolgathering, speculation and avoidance of not nice things.


 

November 23, 2005

Not at all transparent...

That Radio City Music Hall settlement was a big deal, right? Let's read about it at the Local 802 Website.

Presto!

From Local 802's website (press release page), this morning.

Oops. Gonna have to get another hat.

Let's go to the main page at local802afm.org:

 

There we go. But the only thing to which the headline links is a detail-free press release from the mayor.

No statement from 802? Nothing about terms, gains, losses?

Nothing about the Virtual Orchestra Machine, even?

"More details to follow in upcoming December issue of Allegro"? (Allegro is Local 802's journal.)

MORE details? But there aren't ANY details here at all.

Something about this suggests that there was no post-ratification champagne party.

(Probably it's too close to the holidays. Wouldn't want to overindulge.)


 

October 31, 2005

 

Riverhead, NY, November 9, 1982


Links to much or all of our older material will be right along. (Most of which can be found via Google in the meantime.)

(This page was supposed to have been a temporary home page until we got (re)organized.
What can we say? How about, "Free Beer Tomorrow"?)



(The guest article on Local 4-Sale has been moved here .)



October 19, 2005

The Local 4 trial

The verdict, as it was delivered Monday night

 


October 18, 2005 (1:35 AM)

Local 4 Secretary-Treasurer Not Guilty

DiCosimo amazed, and yet, somehow, not delighted.

Details, if we can, when we can.


 

October 17, 2005

The next best thing to a Kangaroo Court...

...as Local 4 puts its Secretary-Treasurer on trial tonight.

This story has everything that's Not Nice: Pots calling kettles black, conflicts of interest, attempts to influence the jury, last minute change of venue, new requirements for admission to meeting...

We're supposed to be on the road already. But we will try to provide a few details after breakfast.

Update (1:50 PM): We're sorry, but our time has run out. We absolutely MUST leave for New York. So we probably won't get to update this until after the meeting in question. We'll be back as soon as we can manage to get unpacked or after tomorrow's rehearsals.

Update 2 (2:40 PM): OK, this really can't wait. We've got coffee on, so at least the beginning of the drive won't be too painful. We are not yet packed, so will get in late tonight. Hopefully the key to the apartment works.

The editor has been forwarded an e-mail message that was sent yesterday to a large group of members of Local 4. The message, portions of which we have reproduced below, was sent by an official (though not an elected officer) of Local 4, Tom Fries. Fries (a guy the editor knows and likes, but who appears to have a conflict of interest in this affair) has been running the Local's booking agency (we don't get this business of AFM Locals owning booking agencies, but that's for another time), and -- at the time the Secretary-Treasurer was charged with various violations by the Local's Executive Board -- Fries was appointed to a committee of three to meet with the charged officer. The actual function of the committee is unclear. It is not specified in the minutes of the meeting at which the S-T was charged. A member of the Local, on the phone with the editor, quickly perused the bylaws and found no requirement that such a committee be set up. (To be certain, we will study our copy of the bylaws for clues, when we catch up with it in New York later tonight.) We assume that the committee is intended to be some sort of fact finding commission, but who knows?

In any case, as Fries is acting in an official capacity in this matter, he should not have sent ANY message to the membership regarding the charges. He certainly should not have taken a public position - official or personal - on the guilt or innocence of the officer in question. But, alas, he does (despite his disclaimer), thereby prejudging the outcome of the hearing, possibly causing others to do so and, perhaps, influencing the outcome.

All of the members of the committee have certain, well, conflicts of interest:

Tom Fries: in addition to the above noted problems, he is a bandleader, sometime contractor (i.e., employer or employer representative)

Sandy Baxter (currently Recording Secretary for Board meetings; formerly Executive Board member - neither of these is necessarily a disqualifier): contractor or assistant contractor for several organizations in Cleveland (held these positions when she was an elected official as well)

John Gallo (Executive Board member): made one or more of the charges against the current Secretary-Treasurer (hardly a disinterested party)

Following are a few excerpts (just the beginning and the end), annotated of course, from Tom Fries' October 16 message to members:

This is "FYI" (for your information). This is not for soliciting nor to sway anyone's position, but these are facts that I feel require your attention. My name is Tom Fries. I have been a member of the Cleveland Federation of Musicians (CFM) for over 28 years. I was recently hired to assist at the CFM offices and have been working there regularly throughout the past 6 weeks. I was a witness to events that led up to the CFM Board of Directors filing charges against Nicholas Polombo. [He's a witness, but he's also on the committee looking into the matter???] I would really appreciate it if you attended the important union hearing this coming Monday, October 17th, at 7:00PM. It will be in a basement hall at 3250 Euclid Avenue, Laborer's Building Local 310. You must be a Local 4 CFM member in good standing as of October 17 and will need a photo ID to be admitted. [After a more or less proper notification to the members regarding the meeting sent 30 days prior to the scheduled hearing, on October 11 - 6 days before the meeting, President Leonard DiCosimo sent a notification of both a change of venue - originally it was to be the Union hall - and of entrance requirements: a photo ID has never been required for admission to a union meeting before this.] To me, it is one of the most important issues the union has ever had in many years. It is planned that the charges will be read and responses will be heard from both sides fully and completely. Then you will vote.You probably have been notified of the charges brought against Nicholas Polombo by the current CFM Board of Directors. These are very serious charges and with a 2/3 majority vote by secret ballot, Nick would be removed from office as the Secretary-Treasurer.

[This is the first mention anywhere that this meeting has to do with removing the official from his position. Even the otherwise seemingly proper notice sent last month did not specify that this would be the purpose of the meeting.]

During the past few days, I've been typing for many hours on my own time, trying to figure out a letter to write to our membership because according to CFM by-laws, you are the ones to decide this matter. I've decided to keep it short and to the point. If you're really interested, you may find more detailed information in past minutes of the CFM Board of Directors or at the hearing. CFM President Leonard DiCosimo told me he will be present and happy to answer any questions you may have for him. I will also be happy to answer any questions at any time.

[Here he provides some details of the charges. We have omitted them as it is the process and impropriety that we are concerned with here.]

I hope that I have encouraged you to attend Monday's very important hearing. I want the full and complete truth to prevail. In reading my Webster's Illustrated Dictionary (published in 1962) I recieved as a youngster, it defines "unionism" as "The principles on which a union is based and the resulting system". "Union" has a number of definitions including "The act of joining together or state of being united"; an organization of workers in one trade; a league of states; harmony; that which is joined together; etc. Synonyms are "agreement, alliance, combination, coalition", etc. I hope you understand what these things really mean. I have been active in the CFM for over 25 years and hope you will be interested in this most important event. Keep in mind that it is you, the members, who need to vote on these charges in person on Monday, October 17th at 7:00PM.

[There are probably a few other words he should have looked up. "Prejudice" is but one of them.]

I support the CFM Board of Directors fully and completely regarding the filed charges. I have been present at all of the board meetings since I was hired on Monday, August 29th, 2005. It has solely been my decision to inform you of this information.

[He wants members to know that he supports the "Board of Directors fully and completely regarding the filed charges." Meaning that he finds the Secretary-Treasurer guilty. But, of course, he isn't trying to influence the membership's decision at all.]

 


October 12, 2005

Warning of Impending Publishing Delays Due to Travel

Stand by, if you can, for the latest on DiCosimo, Leonard and Local 4's adventures in collective bargaining, elimination of enemies and violations of labor law* - amplified with hilarious quotes from a certain hopeless union journal. Yes, it's the return of "Parsing the International Musician."

We'll try to make it back here quickly.

* and the bylaws


 

October 11, 2005

Apropos Exhibit "A," just below (updated)

We posted the following paragraph yesterday thinking that somebody got smart and revoked the fee in question.

Though we are awaiting a confirmation copy of the letter itself, we must pass along this information: A source we shall call Agent X informed us over the weekend that the paperwork for the next Cleveland Pops concert was sent out on the 4th of October, and it did NOT include any mention of a $20 payroll processing charge for musicians who are not members of the union. Our first article on this matter (other than an earlier "tease") appeared here on September 28. We almost hesitate to speculate why someone (and which someone?) had a change of heart.

UnionMuse, October 10, 2005

We assumed too much. An e-mail just came in from one of our sources telling the editor that the February letter from the Pops, published immediately below, was the only such letter that our friend ever received from the Pops. Since, as of last week, all of our correspondents said that this $20 processing charge policy was in effect at Local 4, it appears that this letter was either a notice to musicians that such a policy was just being instituted, or it was simply a reminder of the existence of the policy. Though no one is absolutely certain as to just when the Local started to impose the fee, the consensus is that it was relatively recently - within the last year, most likely. If we get anything more definite, we will pass it along.

Meanwhile, and until we hear otherwise, we will assume that Local 4 is still shaking down nonmembers for $20 in order for them to get paid (per paycheck if one reads the letter literally).

Reports have come in that the policy has also been applied to (and announced by) other ensembles that are paid through Local 4.

Details when we have them.


October 7, 2005

Could this be Exhibit "A" at the Department of Labor AND the NLRB?

(We did tell you it's not a hypothetical situation.)

A letter like this is sent to each musician hired for Cleveland Pops engagements.

It would seem to implicate both the employer and the union in an illegality or three.

We should be able to parse the letter soon and explain (again) just what's the matter with all of this.

Also in the nearish future, we should have a few words on Nick Polombo, mentioned above, and recently improperly (we think) put on administrative leave from his elected position of union Secretary-Treasurer by Leonard You-Know-Who and the In-Leonard's-Pocket Executive Board of Local 4.

A missing preposition was restored October 9 at Miss Blogstein's insistence.


 

Coming Up Next (or soon after next): another excerpt or two from that groundbreaking Cleveland Pops CBA

 

We are in the middle of two pressing projects, and haven't had any writing time since before the weekend. Things should ease up shortly, though.

Thanks for checking back.

 

October 5, 2005


 

September 28, 2005

Hey, Local Officers, this is so brilliant,
you'll wish you'd thought of it.

What's that, again, about an employer who charges employees a fee to get their paychecks?

Bear with us while we set this up; this is NOT a hypothetical situation.

Wages must be paid "free and clear." Other than taxes and other lawful deductions (such as union dues, IF voluntarily authorized -- another favorite subject), the full value of one's wages must be paid. On time. In cash or in a form (such as a check) convertible to cash, on company time and at no cost to the employee. This is the responsibility of the employer.

Let's say that the employer contracts with a third party to process its payroll (well known ADP is one such company - but this is not about ADP). The payroll information is sent to the payroll service. The service enters the info into its computer and out pops a pile of checks, which checks go back to the employer in time for the contractually specified pay date. The payroll company charges the employer a fee for this service.

If either the employer or the payroll company charges any employee a fee for payroll processing, this would be a reasonably serious violation of the law. If it is the payroll company that is imposing the fee, most likely the employer is jointly liable, since it is the EMPLOYER'S duty to pay the wages "free and clear."

If the party charging the fee is the payroll company, it is not only breaking the law as described above, but it is also "double dipping," since the employer is already paying it a fee to process the payroll. Nice scam, if you can pull it off.

And someone does.

As we said, this does not describe a hypothetical situation.

The names of the principals will be familiar to alert readers.

The employer is the Cleveland Pops Orchestra, recent beneficiary of a three year sweetheart deal with Local 4.

And who is the payroll company? (come on, you can guess this one)

Well, of course, it's Local 4.

My, my.

Yes, Local 4 processes the payroll for the Cleveland Pops (and other employers around town).

Local 4 charges real money to do this.

Each musician hired for an engagement with the Cleveland Pops receives a letter that informs the recipient that he or she will be charged a $20 fee for payroll processing if the musician is not a member in good standing of Local 4. We have not yet seen the letter (one is on the way to us), so we don't know whether this is characterized as a one time charge or a per-engagement fee. Either way, it's definitely not nice.

The Cleveland Pops is already paying Local 4 to do its payroll.

For shame (don't you think?)!

This nonmember surcharge is a relatively new fund raising scheme, quite likely the illegitimate brainchild of a Local 4 Executive Board member, no doubt in cahoots with the President and Hothead-In-Chief, Leonard "Where's My Bylaw Variance?" DiCosimo.

When musicians play for the Pops for the first time, they do not receive the usual bundle of papers to fill out (W-4, I-9, etc.), but are told that they must go to Local 4's offices to register with the payroll service (if they have not already registered there to be paid for work done elsewhere) - a bit of an inconvenience for out of town musicians in particular. All of this paperwork should be available on the job, we think, but perhaps we're very old fashioned.

Local 4 apparently processes the Pops' payroll with its house payroll. It does not appear to own a separately incorporated payroll company. (It does own a booking agency, separately incorporated, but that's another story or two.) There may or may not be some legal issues here involving employer payments to a union.

Finally, there is a small matter of illegality involving the withholding of work dues. Not one musician to whom we have spoken recalls filling out a check-off authorization for the Cleveland Pops (or any other job paid through the Local), yet work dues have been taken out of checks issued by Local 4.

Check-off authorization forms must be specific to the employer. One signed years ago (voluntarily, of course), or included as part of an application to join the union, will not do.

We'll be back when we can get back.

*****

This story's UnionMuse mirth rating:

(Terribly Amusing, but not what we would call Funny)


September 23, 2005

On it, the road

Although we never have published on any predictable schedule (or any schedule at all), we will, in the future, try to let you know when we plan to be away, so as to minimize disappointment.

This is one of those times. We are off later today to secure temporary housing for our next period of actual employment in our previous hometown. It is remotely possible that we will post a word or two before we go (or, hotel internet connection willing, while we're out), but most likely the next word from us won't be until at least Monday.

Meanwhile, if you've a mind to do so, call Leonard DiCosimo at Local 4 (216-771-1802) and ask him how the campaign to get rid of his hand picked Secretary-Treasurer is going.

 


September 22, 2005

 

Issues around grievances

(from the brandly new Cleveland Pops CBA, Leonard "Surely You Jest" DiCosimo, co-author)

Should any grievances, disputes, or complaint arise over the interpretation or application of this Agreement, there shall be an earnest effort on the part of the parties to arrange a resolution promptly without recourse to the grievance procedure or to arbitration...

"Without recourse to the grievance procedure"? What is it with the word "grievance"?

We have seen panic in the faces of employees and employer representatives alike when the word is mentioned. "I just have a small problem; I don't really have a GRIEVANCE," a musician with a grievance might say.

We thought that grievance procedures existed to make problem resolution easier and less formal — less confrontational — than going to court or punching the union president employer in the nose.

Anyway, since the above quoted paragraph is the first thing one reads under the heading "Grievance Procedure," is it not, in effect, part of the grievance procedure?

 


September 18, 2005

Sunday Funnies

An excerpt from the Cleveland Pops CBA

What kind of idiot would agree to a contract clause like this? (HINT)

Except by permission of the Cleveland Pops, in its sole discretion, no Musician shall be permitted to use or bring to rehearsals or performances:

1. Sound Shields;
2. Visible Ear Plugs (and the use of any ear plugs will only be after consultation with and approval by the Musical Director); and
3. The wearing of coats or other inappropriate apparel at any concert.

(We don’t quite get number 3, but assume it has to do with concerts that may have taken place in cold venues. We’ve made some inquiries and will report if and when we hear back.)


September 18, 2005

Just off hand...

What would you think about an employer charging employees a payroll processing fee?

You know, first you work for money, and then they charge you to get at the money you worked for.

Just asking. (We'll tell you why in not too long.)


September 14, 2005

Leading off the UnionMuse Masters of Collective Bargaining Series:

Leonard DiCosimo

President, Local 4, Cleveland

Congratulations, Leonard DiCosimo, for doing a brilliant job putting together a first Collective Bargaining Agreement with the Cleveland Pops Orchestra.

The contract is a real piece of work. And so is DiCosimo, since he signed off on some fairly amazing provisions. Among them are the first orchestra contract clause in memory that bans the use of sound shields and other hearing protection without the advance permission of the employer and a clause allowing the employer to pay musicians who are not members of Local 4 as Independent Contractors.

The contract does not provide for job security in any way, and it has no provision for dismissal review. In fact, hiring and firing are conveniently (and creatively) tucked away in a rather comprehensive Management Rights clause, reasonably safe from the reach of the Grievance and Arbitration procedure (which, amazingly, the contract does include).

There's more (though this is the best, we think). And it's on the way.

The Editors

p.s.: We almost forgot: The contract hasn't been ratified. But don't get too excited, because we don't mean "yet." It's not going to be ratified, because DiCosimo and the employer simply made the deal without musician input and signed on the dotted line.

 

We hardly know what to say.

Except...

A variant of this portrait is reported to hang in the Cleveland Orchestra Musicians Lounge.


 

For what it's worth

 


Someone claiming to be a Cleveland Pops musician sent this photo to us this morning. The e-mail said the photo was taken in front of the Local 4 building in Cleveland, but the sender could provide no further information. Our correspondent said that the only life on the sidewalk was a pack of mangy dogs milling around the person in the pillory. He tried to ask the guy if he was ok, but said he just grinned and grinned.

 

Funny. We've never seen anyone in a pillory when we've been in Cleveland. We must have been in the wrong neighborhood. We wonder who this guy is (he looks vaguely familiar); and what on earth is he doing in there.

 

UPDATE!!! Yes, we HAD seen that face before (see above).

 

September 12, 2005


An Independent Journal for Members of the American Federation of Musicians


Lou Barranti, editor

Typing by Miss Blogstein

 

Copyright, or something, 2006 by UnionMuse

e-mail: editor AT unionmuse DOT com

Page revised May 3, 2006

Broken links and images occurred when the page was archived on December 16, 2006. Such as we noticed were repaired; please let us know if we missed any.